Saturday, 12 March 2011

Relative Interchange by Phil Goldstein



Focus by Phil Goldstein 1990
Page 39 et seq.

Personal Comment: There are a lot of versions of this trick on YouTube. Which is odd, because this trick is not great. Both in terms of effect and method. I don't like it. It takes way too long. There is a lot to remember. I find it to be boring. The routine was inspired by Stewart Judah's "Aces & Jacks"; however the Goldstein version is "far more elaborate".

Difficulty 2/5

2 comments:

  1. Rafael Benatar has a beautiful but nifty version of this one which is worth to check out.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hate pushing the audience's assumptions/memories like this. Ortiz talks about how dangerous it is to leave a principal card face down for too long, because eventually the spectator's will start to grow suspicious. I agree. This entire effect revolves on the assumption that the spectators will take your word that those cards on the table really are what you showed way back at the beginning.

    ReplyDelete